As the spread of ash dieback across Britain becomes more noticeable, there is a peak in interest about the consequences of ash dieback, with landowners and conservationists seeking good advice about what tree species is best to plant to help nature recover.
The following information is a summary of the findings of a research paper I co-authored, published in 2019. As with many research papers, unless the researchers pay the publishers, then the paper is hidden behind a paywall for readers. After all, someone has to pay for the costs of publication. In this case, the paper was featured in the journal’s blog, along with a supplementary guide for landowners. I am therefore pleased to be able to provide the following information without falling foul of copyright. If you are interested in accessing the full paper in the Journal of Applied Ecology, here are the details:
Hill, L, G Hemery, A Hector, and N Brown. 2019. “Maintaining Ecosystem Properties after Loss of Ash in Great Britain.” Journal of Applied Ecology 56 (2): 282–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13255
Our approach used the distributions and functional traits of tree species to map the changes in traits that may occur across Britain. Functional traits are the characteristics of organisms that can influence ecosystem functioning (such as height or fruit type), and where there are large changes in the functional traits present in an ecosystem there are likely to also be changes to other important aspects of ecosystems. For instance, the provision of ecosystem services and the suitability of an ecosystem for habitation by other species are both closely linked to the functional traits of the ecosystem.
Three Key Actions for Landowners
1. Replace ash in vulnerable ecosystems with recommended tree species mixes, by planting or encouraging regeneration:
In many cases planting will be important to supplement natural regeneration. Older trees have higher ecological value, so planting should start as soon as possible after ash loss, especially in locations with very high densities of ash. This is particularly important in highly vulnerable areas and woodland types. See below for recommendations of species mixtures in different locations and woodland types.
2. Replace lost ash trees outside of woodlands with suitable mixtures of trees:
Replant ash trees as they are lost from hedgerows etc. If you are in a vulnerable region, consider using recommended species (see tables below). Ash trees outside of woodlands have a critical role in connecting patches of fragmented woodland across the countryside. Maintaining this connectivity after loss of many ash trees should be a key aim of management.
3. Encourage compensatory growth and regeneration of other tree species:
Enhance natural regeneration and resilience of woodlands by managing pressures (such as herbivore damage, abandonment, pollution, invasive species and diseases). Management prescriptions will depend on specific threats to individual woodlands and might include thinning, herbivore control, action on invasive species, and promoting diversity within stands. More information and advice can be found in the UK Forestry Standard (UKFS)
Selecting replacements to ash in Britain’s most vulnerable regions
These are the most highly recommended tree species for the replacement of ash in regions of Britain most vulnerable to ash loss. Recommended species are those that would compensate best for the lost functional traits of ash in each area, and are listed in order of priority. Ideally all species listed would be included where possible.
|Most Vulnerable Regions||Recommendations for Replacement Species|
|Yorkshire Wolds||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Tilia cordata; Quercus petraea|
|Cannock Chase||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Acer campestre|
|Fenland||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Acer campestre; Quercus petraea|
|Northern Norfolk Broads||Prunus avium; Tilia cordata; Acer pseudoplatanus; Castanea sativa|
|Anglesey||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Acer campestre; Quercus petraea|
|Western Wigtownshire||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Quercus petraea|
|West Ayrshire||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Quercus petraea|
|South Pembrokeshire||Populus tremula; Alnus glutinosa; Castanea sativa|
|Herefordshire||Alnus glutinosa; Acer campestre; Quercus petraea|
Selecting replacements to ash in different NVC communities
The following NVC woodland community types [*see reference below] contain constant or frequent ash. The recommended species are those that would compensate best for the lost functional traits of ash in each community type, and are listed in order of priority. Ideally all species listed would be included where possible.
*Hall, J.E., Kirby, K.J., Whitbread, A.M. (2004). National vegetation classification field guide to woodland. Download publication.
|NVC woodland sub-communities|
|W5a||Sorbus aucuparia; Rhamnus cathartica; Quercus robur; Betula pubescens|
|W5b||Sorbus aucuparia; Rhamnus cathartica; Alnus glutinosa; Quercus robur|
|W7a||Sorbus aucuparia; Betula pubescens; Acer pseudoplatanus; Quercus robur|
|W7c||Betula pubescens; Acer pseudoplatanus; Sorbus aucuparia|
|W8a||Populus tremula; Acer campestre; Sorbus aucuparia|
|W8b||Populus tremula; Sorbus aucuparia; Acer campestre|
|W8c||Alnus glutinosa; Populus tremula; Quercus petraea|
|W8d||Populus tremula; Acer campestre, Quercus petraea|
|W8e||Betula pubescens; Acer campestre; Quercus petraea|
|W8f||Acer pseudoplatanus; Acer campestre; Quercus petraea|
|W8g||Sorbus aucuparia; Prunus padus; Quercus petraea|
|W9a||Alnus glutinosa; Betula pubescens; Prunus padus|
|W9b||Prunus padus; Sorbus aucuparia; Populus tremula|
|W10e||Betula pubescens; Alnus glutinosa; Quercus petraea|
|W12a||Acer pseudoplatanus; Acer campestre; Quercus robur|